Are the similarities between Early Egypt and Sumer so great that the two civilizations ought to be regarded as influencing each other?
I do not think that these two civilizations can be regarded as influencing each other because they are two very different civilizations. Yes, both Sumer And Egypt had writing systems, but they are two very different forms or writing. Also Egypt was very isolated, they were surrounded by mountains, deserts, and the Mediterranean Sea. So there was not much of a chance that Sumerian influence would have made it to Egypt.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of absolute monarchy as a form of government?
I think that the only time that absolute monarchy is a good thing is when there is a very good, just ruler (like Jesus) who will do exactly what is right for all. If the ruler is good, then all of their decrees will be made and put into effect immediately, and everything would be great. Unfortunately if the ruler was corrupt, then no one would have the power to say anything against the king, or to stop him. If absolute monarchy was to succeed, a perfect ruler would be needed.
Thoughtful comments, Celine. Even when a ruler is considered absolute, there is in theory a degree of accountability in place, as that absolute ruler is considered God's representative on earth, and comes to symbolize the nation state (absolute monarchs of early modern Europe also serve as a great example of this). How do you think the consolidation of power in configured differently across the different kingdoms of Ancient Egypt?
ReplyDelete