Based on your viewing of the History Channel so far, how would you classify it as a historical source and why?
I would classify the History Channel's Dark Ages as a secondary source because there are no eyewitnesses and no one saw anything firsthand, however, the speakers gave us eyewitness accounts and they presented artwork and visual evidence, which was very carefully studied before it was presented yo the viewers.
How reliable do you consider this to be? why?
I consider this source to be very reliable, because these people have devoted a lot of time to studying these materials, and they brought in first hand accounts, although they didn't mention whose eyewitness accounts they were, but if they mentioned that I think that their source would have been even more reliable
No comments:
Post a Comment